State v. Damico

Florida District Courts of Appeal
State v. Damico, 742 So. 2d 349 (1999)
1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10704; 1999 WL 596936
Green, Stringer, Threadgill

State v. Damico

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the sentence imposed. See State v. Cotton, 728 So.2d 251 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)(holding that the trial court has discretion to determine whether a defendant should be sentenced as a Prison Re-*350leasee Reoffender under the Prison Re-leasee Reoffender Act). See also Coleman v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D1324, 739 So.2d 626 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); State v. Cowart, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D1085, 740 So.2d 20, 1999 WL 245876 (Fla. 2d DCA Apr.28, 1999); State v. Wise, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D657, 740 So.2d 20, 1999 WL 123568 (Fla. 4th DCA Mar.10, 1999). We acknowledge and certify conflict with Woods v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D831, 740 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), and McKnight v. State, 727 So.2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

Affirmed; conflict certified.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., GREEN and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE of Florida v. Joseph M. DAMICO
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published