Raytheon Services v. Genna
Raytheon Services v. Genna
Opinion of the Court
In this workers’ compensation appeal, we affirm the award of permanent total disability benefits because it is supported by competent substantial evidence. However, we reverse the award of palliative neurological care and treatment because it is not supported by competent substantial evidence.
AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED IN PART.
Concurring in Part
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
The claimant did not prove that his industrial accident was the major contributing cause of the discogenic pain his physician testified would, in any event, permit him to do light work. The claimant was,
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.