Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1999

Ferguson v. State

Ferguson v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 3, 1999 · Cope, Jorgenson, Nesbitt
744 So. 2d 558; 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14591; 1999 WL 993086 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Ferguson v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Leaving aside any question of procedural bar, the order denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus is affirmed on the authority of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.140(g), which provides: “No objection to an information on the ground that it was not signed or verified, as herein provided, shall be entertained after the defendant pleads to the merits.” See also Byrd v. State, 730 So.2d 382, 383 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Colson v. State, 717 So.2d 554, 555 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Montanez v. State, 630 So.2d 1163 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Morffy v. State, 534 So.2d 733, 734 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Holt v. State, 516 So.2d 25

*559(Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Carey v. State, 349 So.2d 820, 822 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.