Martin v. State
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- United States v. Bennie Wiley (11th Cir. 2017)
- Cassidy v. McNeil (United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida 2008)
- Baldwin v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
- Williams v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The sole issue in this case is whether the knife used by appellant to assault and injure his victim by slashing his eye could not, as a matter of law, qualify as a deadly weapon in a prosecution for aggravated battery. The defendant characterizes the knife as a “pocketknife.” The defendant asserts a pocketknife can never be a deadly weapon; the State says anything can be a deadly weapon if used in a way likely to produce great bodily harm. The defendant relies on L.B. v. State, 700 So.2d 370 (Fla. 1997). L.B. involved a weapon possession charge, however. There, the court found that the term “common pocketknife” found in section 790.001(13), Florida Statutes (1995) was not unconstitutionally vague and included the knife at issue in that case. Here, we have a pocketknife (of some sort)
AFFIRMED.
. Also, it is not adequately established in the record that the knife used by appellant was a ‘'common pocketknife.” See Walls v. State, 730 So.2d 294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.