Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1999

Grice v. State

Grice v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 10, 1999 · Gross, Klein, Warner
748 So. 2d 317; 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14837; 1999 WL 1016281 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Grice v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Bortel v. State, 743 So.2d 595 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

WARNER, C.J., KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

070rehearing

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING/REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing/rehearing en banc denied.

*318We certify conflict with Heggs v. State, 718 So.2d 263 (Fla.2d DCA), rev. granted, 720 So.2d 518 (Fla. 1998), on the applicable window period for challenging Chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida, as being violative of the single subject rule of article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution.

WARNER, C.J., KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑