Betancourt v. Villar-Pinero
Betancourt v. Villar-Pinero
748 So. 2d 1058; 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16574; 1999 WL 1111791
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Betancourt v. Villar-Pinero
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979).
GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ., concur.
Dissenting Opinion
(dissenting).
I cannot agree that personal service was accomplished on defendant Betancourt. The appropriate method for such service in this case is that set out in section 48.194, Florida Statutes (1999), which method was not followed by plaintiff Villar-Pinero. As a result, the trial court should have quashed the improper service of process.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.