Thompson v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Thompson v. State, 764 So. 2d 612 (1999)
1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12716; 1999 WL 767419
Gross, Gunther, Hazouri

Thompson v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Rollinson v. State, 748 So.2d 585 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Young v. State, 719 So.2d 1010 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), rev. denied, 727 So.2d 915 (Fla. 1999); State v. Vixamar, 687 So.2d 300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (holding no constitutional right to enforce plea bargain); Winokur v. State, 605 So.2d 100, 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (holding that a defendant is not constitutionally entitled to a plea bargain); Jesus v. State, 565 So.2d 1361, 1365 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (“[I]f sentence is within the limits prescribed by the Legislature, we have no jurisdiction to interfere.”) (quoting Banks v. State, 342 So.2d 469, 470 (Fla. 1976)).

GUNTHER, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Versie Lee THOMPSON v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published