UNITED AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. v. Padron
UNITED AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. v. Padron
775 So. 2d 372; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15188; 2000 WL 1726922
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
UNITED AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. v. Padron
Opinion
UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
Benita E. PADRON, et al., Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
*373 Perez, Goran & Rodriguez and Luis N. Perez, Coral Gables, for appellant.
Laurie S. Moss, Davie, and Diane H. Tutt, Plantation, for appellees.
Before GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Because the appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion by determining the lodestar amount of attorneys' fees or by applying a 1.5 contingency risk multiplier, we affirm the award of attorneys' fees. See Centex-Rooney Constr. Co. v. Martin County, 725 So.2d 1255 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.