Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Donald v. State

Donald v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 20, 2000 · Per Curiam
755 So. 2d 816; 2000 WL 424101 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Donald v. State

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

755 So.2d 816 (2000)

Steve Anthony DONALD, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D00-1005.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 20, 2000.

Steve Anthony Donald, pro se, petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Steve Anthony Donald petitions this court for a writ of mandamus, complaining of certain actions or omissions on the part of the trial judge and defense counsel in his criminal prosecution. We find that direct appeal and a motion for postconviction relief serve as adequate legal remedies to correct any of the described errors. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Hall v. Key, 476 So.2d 787 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

BARFIELD, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.