Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Bandy v. Sheffield

Bandy v. Sheffield
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 4, 2000 · Per Curiam
751 So. 2d 164; 2000 WL 125929 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Bandy v. Sheffield

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

751 So.2d 164 (2000)

Fabian BANDY, Appellant,
v.
Frank SHEFFIELD, Appellee.

No. 1D98-3803.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 4, 2000.

Fabian Bandy, Pro Se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Daniel A. David, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The lower court should not have dismissed the appellant's mandamus petition without clarifying what additional filings were needed to comport with the case management order, and without then giving the appellant a reasonable amount of time within which to comply. See Gonzalez v. Moore, 743 So.2d 158 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). The appealed order is therefore reversed and the case is remanded.

ALLEN, WEBSTER and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.