Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Roger v. State

Roger v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 16, 2000 · Fletcher, Goderich, Schwartz
749 So. 2d 1275; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1373; 2000 WL 159137 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Roger v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

There is no merit in any of the claims of trial or sentencing error suggested by counsel or raised by the appellant individually. Any reliance on Thompson v. State, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla. 1999), which held the Gort Act, under which Roger was sentenced, unconstitutional, is unavailing because his offense was committed on April 17, 1998, after the legislature “revalidated” the statute. Lee v. State, 739 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑