Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Sarduy v. State

Sarduy v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 16, 2000 · Cope, Nesbitt, Sorondo
750 So. 2d 167; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1376; 2000 WL 159088 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Sarduy v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Fidel Sarduy, defendant, seeks the issuance of a writ of mandamus compelling the trial court to rule on his motion for rehearing of the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief.

*168Although the motion for rehearing cannot be found in the court file, the computerized docket sheets for defendant’s cases reflect that such a motion was filed. Accordingly, we deny defendant’s petition for writ of mandamus and direct him to file a copy of his original motion for rehearing. The trial court will rule on the re-filed motion within thirty days of the date of filing.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.