Bridges v. State
Bridges v. State
750 So. 2d 782; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2309
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Bridges v. State
Opinion of the Court
Upon the State’s proper confession of error, we reverse the denial of defendant’s 3.800 motion and remand for resentencing. See Wick v. State, 651 So.2d 765 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)(combination of probation and prison term must not exceed statutory maximum); see also Martell v. State, 676 So.2d 1030, 1031 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)(Rule 3.850, not Rule 3.800 is “the proper means to challenge a court’s failure to order a presentence investigation”).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.