Cruse v. Cruse
Cruse v. Cruse
752 So. 2d 121; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2188; 2000 WL 242914
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cruse v. Cruse
Opinion of the Court
The trial judge erred in awarding fees when the former wife had neither requested fees in a pleading nor given the former husband notice that fees would be at issue. Bull v. Bull, 584 So.2d 171 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Accordingly, that portion of the judgment ordering the former husband to pay $500 of the former wife’s attorney’s fees is reversed. In all other respects, the judgment on appeal is affirmed.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.