Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Briceno v. Precision Delivery System, Inc.

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 8, 2000 · Cope, Shevin, Sorondo

752 So. 2d 131; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2227 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Montanez v. Compass Group USA, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Wells v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Juan Briceno appeals the denial of unemployment compensation benefits. In the present case conflicting testimony was offered by the parties. It was the responsibility of the referee to resolve the conflicts, which he did in this case in favor of the employer. See Wallace v. Zahn Dental Co., Inc., 618 So.2d 382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). This court is not allowed to overturn the referee’s factual findings, as long as there was competent, substantial evidence at the hearing which supports the findings. See Gonzalez v. Master Flowers, Inc., 605 So.2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). As we see no legal basis on which to disturb the referee’s findings, the order is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.