Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

McIntyre v. State

McIntyre v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 29, 2000 · Cope, Levy, Schwartz
753 So. 2d 787; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3720; 2000 WL 313581 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

McIntyre v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Johnny McIntyre appeals his convictions for armed robbery, aggravated assault and aggravated battery. Appointed counsel has filed an Anders1 brief. Defendant-appellant McIntyre has filed a pro se brief. We conclude that the Anders proceeding is appropriate. As to appellant’s pro se brief contending that he does not qualify as a habitual offender, we conclude he does qualify. See Rollins v. State, 707 So.2d 823 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

Affirmed.

. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑