McIntyre v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
McIntyre v. State, 753 So. 2d 787 (2000)
2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3720; 2000 WL 313581
Cope, Levy, Schwartz

McIntyre v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Johnny McIntyre appeals his convictions for armed robbery, aggravated assault and aggravated battery. Appointed counsel has filed an Anders1 brief. Defendant-appellant McIntyre has filed a pro se brief. We conclude that the Anders proceeding is appropriate. As to appellant’s pro se brief contending that he does not qualify as a habitual offender, we conclude he does qualify. See Rollins v. State, 707 So.2d 823 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

Affirmed.

. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Reference

Full Case Name
Johnny McINTYRE v. The STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published