Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

McIntyre v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 29, 2000 · Cope, Levy, Schwartz

753 So. 2d 787; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3720; 2000 WL 313581 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Crapp v. CRIMINAL JUSTICE STANDARDS AND TRAINING COM'N (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Johnny McIntyre appeals his convictions for armed robbery, aggravated assault and aggravated battery. Appointed counsel has filed an Anders1 brief. Defendant-appellant McIntyre has filed a pro se brief. We conclude that the Anders proceeding is appropriate. As to appellant’s pro se brief contending that he does not qualify as a habitual offender, we conclude he does qualify. See Rollins v. State, 707 So.2d 823 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

Affirmed.

. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.