Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Volk v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 8, 2000 · Dell, Gross, Polen

754 So. 2d 82; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2239; 2000 WL 257113 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Francois v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
Barrow v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s “standard response” to the jury’s request for the defendant’s testimony was error. See Rigdon v. State, 621 So.2d 475 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Huhn v. State, 511 So.2d 583 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Roper v. State, 608 So.2d 533 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). However, in this ease we find the error to be harmless. See Goodwin v. State, 751 So.2d 537 (Fla. 1999); Gonzalez v. State, 624 So.2d 300 (Fla. 4th DCA *831993); Farrow v. State, 573 So.2d 161 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

AFFIRMED.

DELL, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.