Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Prado v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 7, 2000 · Altenbernd, Casanueva, Patterson

755 So. 2d 178; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4157; 2000 WL 353945 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Pizano v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Valentine C. Prado appeals the trial court’s denial of his dispositive motion to suppress and his sentence under the 1995 sentencing guidelines. This appeal was stayed pending the supreme court’s ruling in Heggs v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S137, — So.2d -, 2000 WL 178052 (Fla. Feb. *17917, 2000). However, on January 9, 2000, Mr. Prado completed his prison sentence and was released. The sentencing issue is thus moot. We affirm without further discussion the denial of Mr. Prado’s motion to suppress.

Affirmed.

PATTERSON, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.