Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Llinas-Flores v. State

Llinas-Flores v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 12, 2000 · Goderich, Levy, Ramirez
755 So. 2d 188; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4266; 2000 WL 368402 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Llinas-Flores v. State

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The defendant challenges his sentence under the 1995 Sentencing Guidelines on the ground that chapter 95-184, the enacting legislation, violated the single subject requirement of the Florida Constitution. Based upon the Florida Supreme Court’s opinion in Heggs v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S137, - So.2d -, 2000 WL 178052 (Fla. Feb. 17, 2000), we reverse.

Accordingly, we remand to the trial court for resentencing under the guidelines in effect prior to the enactment of chapter 95-184.

Reversed and remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.