Muvico Entertainment, L.L.C. v. Pointe Orlando Development Co.
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Double Park, LLC v. Kaine Parking 125, LLC (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
- INVEGO AUTO PARTS, INC. v. Rodriguez (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the order rendered by the trial court requiring the appellant to deposit into the registry of the court rent that accrued as well as accrues during the pendency of the underlying action. We note, however, that subsection 83.232(2), Florida Statutes (1999), specifically provides that if the tenant contests the amount of money to be paid into the court registry, the court is limited to factual and legal issues concerning what constitutes rent under the lease agreement and whether the tenant is due any credits for rent that has been paid. Therefore, we make no determination concerning the trial court’s interpretation of the abatement clause contained in the lease agreement entered into between the parties to this action since that is a matter to be resolved at trial and not in proceedings under section 83.232.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.