Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Morales v. All Right Miami, Inc.

Morales v. All Right Miami, Inc.
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 19, 2000 · Jorgenson, Shevin, Sorondo
755 So. 2d 198; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4571; 2000 WL 390361 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Morales v. All Right Miami, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

SHEVIN, Judge.

We reverse the final default judgment. The trial court erred in denying Morales’s motion to set aside the default. “The law is well-settled that a default judgment may not be entered against a defendant on a complaint which wholly fails to state a cause of action against the said defendant.” Sunshine Sec. & Det. Agency v. Wells Fargo Armored Servs. Corp., 496 So.2d 246, 246 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). See Becerra v. Equity Imports, Inc., 551 So.2d 486 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). The complaint and exhibits upon which the default was entered demonstrate that Plaintiff, All Right Miami, Inc., was not the payee of the restitution order it sought to enforce against Morales. See Ginsberg v. Lennar Fla. Holdings, Inc., 645 So.2d 490, 494 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)(where exhibits contradict complaint allegations plain meaning of exhibits control), review denied, 659 So.2d 272 (Fla. 1995). The subsequent assignment filed as an attachment to All Right’s motion for final default judgment was not part of its pleadings and does not support the clerk’s default. Therefore, the final default judgment cannot stand.

*199Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.