Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Kent v. State

Kent v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 17, 2000 · Lawrence, Miner, Webster
755 So. 2d 805; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4491; 2000 WL 380238 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Kent v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, the sole issue raised by appellant was not preserved for review because the argument made on appeal was not made in the trial court. § 924.051(l)(b) & (3), Fla. Stat. (1999). See Terry v. State, 668 So.2d 954, 961 (Fla. 1996) (“for an argument to be cognizable on appeal, it must be the specific contention asserted as the legal ground for objection, exception, or motion below”). *806To the extent any error occurred, it is not “fundamental.” Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

MINER, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., CONCUR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.