Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Jolly v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 1, 2000 · Farmer, Hazouri, Shahood

756 So. 2d 142; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2001; 2000 WL 232621 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Roesle (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND CLARIFICATION

SHAHOOD, J.

We grant appellee’s Motion for Rehearing and Clarification, withdraw our opinion filed January 5, 2000, and substitute the following opinion in its place.

We affirm appellant’s revocation of probation. The fact that the misdemeanor charge of possession of cannabis was dismissed by the county court is of no consequence because the order of probation states that appellant shall not “violate any law of any city, county, state, or the United States (a conviction in a court of law is not necessary for you to be found in violation).”

*143The filing of the 3.800(b) motion by appellant, pro se, after the filing of the notice of appeal, has no effect on any further remedies appellant may have pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Affirmed.

FARMER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.