Rodarm v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Rodarm v. State, 756 So. 2d 154 (2000)
2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2717; 2000 WL 275848
Gross, Shahood, Warner

Rodarm v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction for commission of an indecent act on a child under 16 years of age on all issues raised, noting that many of the points on appeal were not objected to or preserved at trial. As to the assessment of points on appellant’s scoresheet for penetration, appellant argues that it was error to include those additional points because the jury did not make a finding of penetration. However, we agree with McCloud v. State, 741 So.2d 512, 514 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)(en banc) and hold that “the scoring of victim injury points under section 921.0024, Florida Statutes (1997) is a ‘sentencing factor,’ not *155an element . of the offense.-... Penetration as a sentencing factor plainly does not need to be charged, nor must it be decided by a jury, nor must it be decided beyond a reasonable doubt.” (Emphasis in original)(footnote and citation omitted).

Affirmed.

WARNER, C.J., SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Ted RODARM, Jr. v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published