Bonnell v. State
Bonnell v. State
756 So. 2d 191; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3986; 2000 WL 347124
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Bonnell v. State
Opinion of the Court
Bonnell pled nolo contendere to resisting arrest without violence, battery on a law enforcement officer, and tampering with evidence. Bonnell specifically reserved the right to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. We have reviewed the record of the hearing on the motion to suppress and find, that the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress. The testimony of the law enforcement officer clearly shows that he had no probable cause to make an arrest or, a founded suspicion to stop Bonnell. The state has stipulated that the motion to suppress is dispositive; therefore, we reverse the convictions on all charges.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.