Rio Miami Corp. v. Balbuena
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc., Helix Subsea Construction, Inc., and Helix Well Ops Inc. v. Matthew Howard (Tex. App. 2014)
- Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Howard (Tex. App. 2014)
- Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. v. Rigby (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
- GOD'S BLESSING LTD. v. KATHY SALAS (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The trial court erred in granting the plaintiff/appellee’s motion to reinstate maintenance and cure because contradicting medical evidence existed which indicated the plaintiffiappellee had not reached maximum medical improvement. See Langmead v. Admiral Cruises, Inc., 610 So.2d 565 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Quarrel v. Minervini, 510 So.2d 977 (Fla. 3d DCA
Accordingly, the order below is reversed and the case is remanded with instructions to send the issue to the jury: See Hendricks v. Dailey, 208 So.2d 101 (Fla. 1968); Quarrel v. Minervini, 510 So.2d at 977.
Reversed and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.