Arrebola v. State
Arrebola v. State
756 So. 2d 1107; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5521; 2000 WL 561662
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Arrebola v. State
Opinion of the Court
As we cannot conclude that the challenged remarks made by the state during its closing arguments in this trial were fundamentally erroneous as urged by the appellant, we affirm his conviction and sentence for burglary of an unoccupied structure. See McDonald v. State, 743 So.2d 501 (Fla. 1999); Sandoval v. State, 689 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).
Affirm.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.