Heinz v. State
Heinz v. State
758 So. 2d 743; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6204; 2000 WL 668451
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Heinz v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s petition for writ of mandamus. Although the petitioner alleged that he was entitled to copies of his transcript from his specially-appointed public defender, he nevertheless filed the petition against the wrong party, the State. This affirmance is without prejudice for the petitioner to refile his petition against the proper party, his specially-appointed public defender.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.