Rivera v. State
Rivera v. State
758 So. 2d 1270; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6830; 2000 WL 725290
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Rivera v. State
Opinion of the Court
We deny the petitioner’s, Mario Olanzo Rivera, petition for writ of habeas corpus. However, in light of the fact that he was sentenced under guidelines which the supreme court has found to be unconstitutional, see Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000), we remand with directions that the petitioner be resentenced pursuant to the guidelines which were valid at the time that he committed the offenses. See also Gomez v. State, 756 So.2d 259 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Ramirez v. State, 752 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Diaz v. State, 752 So.2d 105 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.