Parrish v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Parrish v. State, 760 So. 2d 160 (2000)
2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1355; 2000 WL 172567
Gunther, Shahood, Taylor

Parrish v. State

Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, J.

AFFIRMED. See Watson v. State, No. 97-2868, - So.2d -, 2000 WL 86237 (Fla. 4th DCA Jan.19, 2000); Salters v. State, 731 So.2d 826 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), rev. granted, 749 So.2d 503 (Fla. 1999).

GUNTHER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

070rehearing

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We deny appellant’s motion for rehearing. However, we certify to the supreme court that our holding as to the window of opportunity to challenge Chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida on single subject grounds, as announced in Salters v. State, 731 So.2d 826 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), rev. granted, 749 So.2d 503 (Fla. 1999), conflicts with Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. granted, 111 So.2d 538 (Fla. 1998). See State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla. 1999)(declining to rule on the applicable window period for challenging Chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida on single subject rule grounds).

GUNTHER, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Vincent PARRISH v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published