Sullivan v. State
Sullivan v. State
760 So. 2d 975; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5694; 2000 WL 572702
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Sullivan v. State
Opinion of the Court
Following Speed v. State, 732 So.2d 17 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), and its progeny, we reject the appellant’s argument that the Prisoner Release Reoffender Act (PRRA) is unconstitutional.
The state cross-appealed a sentencing issue alleging that appellant’s thirty year sentence imposed for the offense of robbery with a firearm, a first degree felony punishable by a term of years not exceeding life, should have been enhanced under the PRRA to a life sentence. The decision in State v. Maples, 739 So.2d 127 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) requires enhancement and the cause is remanded for imposition of a life sentence.
SENTENCE VACATED IN PART; REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.