Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Pace v. State

Pace v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 17, 2000 · Hazouri, Taylor, Warner
760 So. 2d 978; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5760; 2000 WL 628261 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Pace v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of the motion to correct illegal sentence filed by appellant Frank Pace, without prejudice to file a new motion for credit for time served, which satisfies the requirements of State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla. 1998) and Thomas v. State, 712 So.2d 848 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Affirmance is with prejudice on the remaining grounds.

WARNER, C.J., TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑