Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Singletary v. State

Singletary v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided July 19, 2000 · Cope, Goderich, Sorondo
761 So. 2d 496; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9006; 2000 WL 1004583 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Singletary v. State

Opinion of the Court

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The defendant challenges his sentence pursuant to the 1995 sentencing guidelines, which were invalidated by Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000), on the ground that chapter 95-184 violated the single subject requirement of the Florida Consti*497tution. The state properly concedes that the underlying offense in this case occurred within the window period determined in Trapp v. State, 760 So.2d 924 (Fla. 2000). Therefore, this cause is reversed and remanded for resentencing under the guidelines in effect prior to the enactment of Chapter 95-184.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.