Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Valdes-Fiallo v. State

Valdes-Fiallo v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided July 12, 2000 · Campbell, Green, Stringer
761 So. 2d 1238; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8741; 2000 WL 952781 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Valdes-Fiallo v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges his judgment and sentences for shooting at, within, or into a building, aggravated assault with a firearm, and carrying a concealed firearm. A review of the record reveals no reversible error as to his convictions, but there is possible error in regard to appellant’s sentences.

The above offenses occurred on August 21, 1996, and appellant was sentenced pursuant to the 1995 sentencing guidelines. Thus, we remand this case to the trial court to reconsider the sentences imposed. See Smith v. State, 761 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). On remand, the trial court is directed to impose the three-year minimum mandatory term required under section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1995), for the aggravated assault with a firearm conviction since failure to do so constitutes fundamental error. See § 775.087(2), Fla. Stat. (1995); State v. Calzada-Padron, 708 So.2d 287 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

*1239Affirmed; remanded for reconsideration.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and GREEN and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.