Schmidt v. State
Schmidt v. State
764 So. 2d 618; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 39; 2000 WL 4834
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Schmidt v. State
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to withdraw a plea after sentencing pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(l). Contradictory testimony was offered below regarding assurances allegedly made to Schmidt by his counsel. We affirm the resolution of those contradictions made by the trial court, which found the testimony of Schmidt’s counsel more credible.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.