Freeman v. State
Freeman v. State
764 So. 2d 883; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10136; 2000 WL 1140445
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Freeman v. State
Opinion of the Court
The Defendant appeals the revocation of his probation. We hold the trial court did not abuse its discretion in revoking the Defendant’s probation and affirm. However, because the trial court failed to enter a written order revoking the Defendant’s probation and setting forth the conditions that it found were violated, we remand solely for the purpose of entering such an order. See Watts v. State, 688 So.2d 1018, 1018-19 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Glendon v. State, 669 So.2d 1148, 1148-49 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
AFFIRMED and REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.