Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Vanderberg v. Moore

Vanderberg v. Moore
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 15, 2000 · Browning, Ervin, Nortwick
765 So. 2d 94; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5712; 2000 WL 574371 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Vanderberg v. Moore

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The trial court should not have dismissed appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus without specifying which documents appellant failed to supply in his previous filings under section 57.085(7), Florida Statutes (1997). See Bandy v. Sheffield, 751 So.2d 164 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Gosman v. Moore, 745 So.2d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

ERVIN, VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.