Vanderberg v. Moore
Vanderberg v. Moore
765 So. 2d 94; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5712; 2000 WL 574371
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Vanderberg v. Moore
Opinion of the Court
The trial court should not have dismissed appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus without specifying which documents appellant failed to supply in his previous filings under section 57.085(7), Florida Statutes (1997). See Bandy v. Sheffield, 751 So.2d 164 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Gosman v. Moore, 745 So.2d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).
REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.