Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Mills v. State

Mills v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 28, 2000 · Blue, Green, Parker
765 So. 2d 153; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8001; 2000 WL 826303 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Mills v. State

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Katharthur Mills appeals his convictions and sentences for burglary of a dwelling and grand theft. We affirm the judgments and sentences but remand for correction of a scrivener’s error. The trial court announced that it was sentencing Mr. Mills as a violent career criminal. The sentencing documents, however, indicate that Mr. Mills was sentenced as a habitual violent felony offender. This should be corrected on remand to reflect that Mr. Mills was sentenced as a violent career criminal. See Bogan v. State, 462 So.2d 115 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985) (holding that written sentence must conform to oral pronouncement).

Affirmed; remanded for correction of scrivener’s error.

PARKER, A.C.J., and BLUE and GREEN, JJ., Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.