Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Merrill v. Partridge

Merrill v. Partridge
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 31, 2000 · Cobb, Griffin, Harris
765 So. 2d 305; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11063; 2000 WL 1227789 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Merrill v. Partridge

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the denial of the initial motion to recuse. As to the amended motion to recuse, it appears from the documents filed in this court that it was untimely filed. See• Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.160(e); Carter v. Howey, 707 So.2d 906 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Dura-Stress, Inc. v. Law, 634 So.2d 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). The petitioner has not demonstrated any good cause for an exception to the ten-day time requirement.

PETITION DENIED.

COBB, HARRIS, and GRIFFIN, JJ„ concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑