Mandri v. State
Mandri v. State
767 So. 2d 523; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8285; 2000 WL 873188
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Mandri v. State
070rehearing
We deny defendant’s motion for rehearing. We grant defendant’s motion to certify the following question of great public importance:
WHERE A TRIAL COURT FAILS TO FILE WRITTEN REASONS IN SUPPORT OF A GUIDELINES DEPARTURE SENTENCE BUT, THEREAFTER, IN RESPONSE TO A FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.800(B) MOTION FILED BY DEFENDANT, DOES FILE WRITTEN REASONS JUSTIFYING THE DEPARTURE, IS DEFENDANT ENTITLED TO A REVERSAL AND A REMAND FOR A GUIDELINES SENTENCE, UNDER MADDOX v. STATE, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla. 2000)?
Question certified.
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla. 2000); State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 1986).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.