Kale v. State
Kale v. State
767 So. 2d 1269; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12328; 2000 WL 1396018
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Kale v. State
Opinion of the Court
Although the trial judge denied the defendant’s 3.850 motion on the erroneous ground that it was untimely filed, we affirm on the authority of section 39.059(7)(d), Florida Statutes (1995). See Cargle v. State, No. SC92031, slip op. at 7 & n. 2, — So.2d-,-& n. 2, 2000 WL 1353726 (Fla. Sept.21, 2000) (majority opinion); id. at 8-10, at-(Pariente, J., concurring).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.