Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Manning v. State

Manning v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 28, 2000 · Barfield, Booth, Wolf
767 So. 2d 1278; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12370; 2000 WL 1421358 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Manning v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises three issues on appeal. We find one to have merit. We reverse appellant’s habitual felony offender sentence based on Walls v. State, 765 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), and Weaver v. State, 764 So.2d 911 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). In all other respects, we affirm.

BARFIELD, C.J., and BOOTH, J., concur; WOLF, J., specially concurring with written opinion.

Concurring Opinion

WOLF, J.,

specially concurring.

I concur in the reversal of the habitual offender sentence because I am required to do so by prior precedent of this court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑