Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Senteno v. State

Senteno v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 8, 2000 · Altenbernd, Danahy, Paul, Whatley
768 So. 2d 523; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11434; 2000 WL 1269300 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Senteno v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the sentence entered in this case on remand from the first appeal. See Senteno v. State, 737 So.2d 1120 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). We reverse the judgment entered on remand' as to count six because that judgment does not comply with the opinion that we issued in the first appeal. On remand, the trial court shall enter a new judgment accurately stating the convictions permitted by our last opinion.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J., and DANAHY, PAUL W., (Senior) Judge, Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.