Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Espanioly v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 4, 2000 · Cope, Fletcher, Jorgenson

768 So. 2d 1230; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12707; 2000 WL 1471619 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Stanley v. STATE, UNEMP. APPEALS COM'N (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Stanley v. State of Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Arteaga v. State, Department of Business & Professional Regulation, Regulatory Council of Community Ass'n Managers (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
Nickolan-Barron v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Nahi J. Espanioly appeals from an order of the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission dismissing her case for lack of jurisdiction. For the following reasons, we reverse.

The appeals referee and Espanioly dispute whether she timely filed an appeal on October 14, 1999. The Commission ordered an evidentiary hearing solely on the issue of the appeal’s timeliness. Espanioly produced as evidence of appealing timely a fax confirmation of her October 14, 1999, Request to Reopen the case. Nevertheless, the Commission dismissed her appeal for lack of jurisdiction, finding that it was filed untimely.

Espanioly’s submission of evidence of the October 14, 1999, facsimile confirmation was sufficient to establish that her appeal was timely; therefore, the Commission has jurisdiction, and the appeal should be reinstated.

Reversed and remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.