Dorival v. State
Dorival v. State
768 So. 2d 1233; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12709; 2000 WL 1471773
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Dorival v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the defendant’s conviction in all respects. See U.S. v. Wilson, 421 U.S. 309, 95 S.Ct. 1802, 44 L.Ed.2d 186 (1975); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.830 (1999). However, as the State concedes, there was a scrivener’s error in the written judgment which stated that the defendant was found guilty of direct criminal contempt rather than indirect criminal contempt. Accordingly, we affirm and remand to the lower court to correct this error.
Affirmed and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.