Salter v. State
Salter v. State
769 So. 2d 430; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11794; 2000 WL 1298831
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Salter v. State
Opinion of the Court
The appellant challenges the denial of his postconviction motion, which raised a facially sufficient claim under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000). The trial court denied the motion because the appellant was sentenced to a negotiated term. However, the court failed to attach a copy of the plea agreement. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court for attachments which refute the appellant’s claim.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.