Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Vangunda v. State

Vangunda v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 28, 2000 · Benton, Booth, Douglass, Shivers
769 So. 2d 448; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12372; 2000 WL 1421445 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Vangunda v. State

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This appeal arises from an order summarily denying Appellant’s motion pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Appellant concedes that the trial court’s denial of claim 1 was proper. Claim 2 is without merit. Therefore, we affirm claims 1 and 2 without further discussion. We remand claim 3 to the trial court for attachment of records conclusively refuting the claim or to conduct an evidentiary hearing.

BOOTH and BENTON, JJ., and SHIVERS, DOUGLASS B., Senior Judge, CONCUR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.