Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Williams v. State

Williams v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 13, 2000 · Harris, Peterson, Sawaya
769 So. 2d 479; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13300; 2000 WL 1513754 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Williams v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of Stanley Williams’ motion to correct sentence pursuant to Rule 3.800(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, because the alleged sentencing error is not readily ascertainable from the face of the record. See Holland v. State, 672 So.2d 566 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 678 So.2d 338 (Fla. 1996).

Our affirmance is without prejudice, thereby allowing Williams to file a legally sufficient Rule 3.850 motion if he can do so in a timely manner.

AFFIRMED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

HARRIS, PETERSON and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.