Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Hale v. State

Hale v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 6, 2000 · Joanos, Padovano, Webster
769 So. 2d 1125; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13057; 2000 WL 1531661 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Hale v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Because the appellant’s sentence could have been lawfully imposed without a departure under the 1994 guidelines, he is not entitled to resentencing. See Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000).

AFFIRMED.

JOANOS, WEBSTER and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.