Tunstall v. State
Tunstall v. State
770 So. 2d 217; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13706; 2000 WL 1567848
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Tunstall v. State
Opinion of the Court
The appellant challenges an order denying his motion seeking postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We reverse and remand for further consideration in light of the decisions in Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000) and Trapp v. State, 760 So.2d 924 (Fla. 2000).
REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.